🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 is remembered as among the most deadly – and momentous – days throughout three decades of unrest in the region.

Within the community where it happened – the memories of Bloody Sunday are visible on the walls and embedded in public consciousness.

A public gathering was conducted on a cold but bright period in Derry.

The march was challenging the system of internment – holding suspects without due process – which had been implemented after three years of violence.

Military personnel from the Parachute Regiment killed 13 people in the Bogside area – which was, and still is, a overwhelmingly Irish nationalist population.

A particular photograph became especially iconic.

Pictures showed a clergyman, Father Daly, using a blood-stained cloth in his effort to protect a assembly transporting a teenager, Jackie Duddy, who had been mortally injured.

News camera operators recorded much footage on the day.

The archive contains the priest explaining to a media representative that soldiers "gave the impression they would discharge weapons randomly" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no reason for the shooting.

This account of what happened was rejected by the first inquiry.

The initial inquiry determined the soldiers had been attacked first.

In the resolution efforts, the administration established another inquiry, in response to advocacy by bereaved relatives, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

In 2010, the conclusion by Lord Saville said that generally, the military personnel had initiated shooting and that zero among the victims had been armed.

The then government leader, the Prime Minister, expressed regret in the Parliament – declaring killings were "unjustified and unacceptable."

Law enforcement commenced look into the events.

A military veteran, referred to as the defendant, was brought to trial for murder.

Accusations were made regarding the fatalities of the first individual, twenty-two, and 26-year-old another victim.

The accused was further implicated of trying to kill several people, additional persons, more people, Michael Quinn, and an unidentified individual.

Exists a judicial decision preserving the veteran's privacy, which his attorneys have maintained is essential because he is at danger.

He stated to the investigation that he had solely shot at individuals who were armed.

This assertion was disputed in the official findings.

Evidence from the inquiry could not be used straightforwardly as testimony in the criminal process.

During the trial, the defendant was screened from view using a protective barrier.

He made statements for the initial occasion in court at a proceeding in late 2024, to reply "not guilty" when the accusations were presented.

Relatives of the deceased on that day travelled from Derry to the judicial building daily of the proceedings.

A family member, whose brother Michael was died, said they understood that attending the proceedings would be emotional.

"I can see all details in my memory," he said, as we examined the primary sites discussed in the trial – from the location, where Michael was killed, to the adjoining the courtyard, where James Wray and another victim were died.

"It returns me to my position that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and place him in the medical transport.

"I relived the entire event during the evidence.

"Despite having to go through the process – it's still meaningful for me."